Re: Retaliatory force and Rational Egoism--some questions...: Ayn Rand Nantucket Campfire
Ayn Rand &
Other Nantucket Live
Chats
If ye would like to moderate the Ayn Rand
Nantucket Campfire, please drop nantucket@nantuckets.com a
line.
Atlas Shrugged, The Fountainhead
The
World's Largest Literary Cafe
[Nantuckets.com][BusinessPhilosophy.com][Classicals.com]
[Nantucket
Poetry Postcards]
[Nantucket
Navy Live Chat][The Jolly Roger][Kill Devil Hill][Western Canon University][Federalistnavy.com Spirit of
America]
[Starbuck.com Classical Poetry Port]
[Kill Devil Hill]
[Shakespearean
Greetings]
[nantucketnavy.com][hatteraslight.com]
[Classicals.com][Western
Canon University Commons]
[Western Canon University
Lecture Halls]
[Nantucket
Poetry Postcards]
[The Crow's
Nest]
[Conservative Books
Lighthouses]
[ Follow Ups ] [
Post Followup ] [ Ayn Rand BusinessPhilosophy.com Lighthouse ] [ ]
[The
World's Largest Literary Cafe]
Posted by TheRadicalTrader on July 30, 19103 at 05:53:40:
In Reply to: Retaliatory force and Rational Egoism--some questions... posted by SBCore on June 18, 19103 at 14:38:52:
The basic reason to use retalitory force against one who intitiates it is, as I think you said, in the name of "justice", which is one of the six derivative virtues. Now, there is no true "revenge factor" in the use of retalitory force, it is merely a rational reaction to the situation. This man (or country, or whatever) has decided to sink to the level of a beast, where force is rule. Thus, rational men, knowing that such a man will not react to rationalism, treat him in the only respect that he himself permits. The retaliators do not gain a single value, they simply protect the values that they hold. I quote Galt, "A holdup man seeks to gain wealth by killing me; I do not grow richer by killing a holdup man. I seek no values by means of evil, nor do I surrender my values to evil.
Clearly, reason should be used to discover penalties, and that is the of the judicial system, which we, as a society, have given full authority to use force. Yes, action can be taken against someone enacting force against someone who is not you. A clear example is if someone beats up your sister, then you are fully in the right to act in a retalitory manner. But, this is not an altruistic action: the person who you act for must be a value to you, it is not your "duty" to act against force for every one of your neighbors (stupid Seinfeld series finale!)
Follow Ups:
Post a Followup
[Poetry]
[Shakespeare]
[Classics]
[Classic eCards]
[American History]
[Great Books]
[Tutors]
[Great Books Forums]
[Greatest Conversation]
[Cairn Studios]
[Great Books & Classics]
Join us before the
mast for
Moby Dick year.
READ THE GREAT BOOKS
TERM PAPERS, RESEARCH PAPERS, ESSAYS
BUY THE GREAT BOOKS
Free postnuke hosting,
blogging, and
photo
galleries @ mobynuke.net
THE THREE BOOKS OF THE RENAISSANCE
SUMMER GREAT BOOKS CHALLENGE
JOLLYROGER.COM PENPALS--MEET FELLOW BOOK LOVERS &
FRIENDS
PERSONALS.JOLLYROGER.COM: MEET FINE SPIRITS
Open Source: Free Photo Gallery Hosting for Stock
Photography
Open Source CMS Renaissance & Digital Rights Management
Free Open Source Blogging & Blog Hosting
Great Books Forum
Open Source Business
DR. ELLIOT'S NORTH AMERICAN GREAT BOOKS TOUR--COMING TO A BOOK
STORE NEAR YOU
Feedback? Would you like to moderate a forum? Contact j o l l y r
o g e r
s h i p @ y a h o o . c o m.
Join The
Renaissance!