Posted by Jorge Lozano on March 22, 19100 at 10:10:09:
In Reply to: Economic Wargames posted by Dal Timgar on August 18, 1999 at 13:04:21:
:
: Economic Wargames
:
: The following essay is about the economic system of the
: world today. One of my readers who approves of the
: contents refers to "economic wargame" as a metaphor.
: Much as I appreciate his approval, I disagree that it
: is a metaphor. This is the real deal. Let me give you
: a metaphorical overview of my presentation.
: The global economy is a giant multilevel, multiplayer
: chess game. It is however, being played in the dark.
: The powers that be, have the overhead lights switched
: off. To have any chance you need a flashlight, and that
: would still leave the problems of learning the rules and
: developing your skills. It seems most people only have
: a vague idea that some game is going on. I hope this
: essay can be a candle, for ye who curse the darkness.
:
: NNP = GNP - Dcap
: This equation defines the Net National Product (NNP).
: It is equated to Gross National Product (GNP) minus
: Depreciation of CAPital goods (Dcap). The trouble with
: this equation is that depreciation of durable consumer
: goods is missing. Random House defines depreciation
: thusly:
: 1. a decrease in value due to wear and tear, decay,
: decline in price, etc.
: 2. U.S. such a decrease as allowed in computing the
: value of property for tax purposes.
: The fourth edition of Macroeconomics by Robert J. Barro
: of Harvard University defines depreciation as:
: The wearing out of CAPITAL goods over time, often
: expressed as a fraction of the stock of capital.
: When a car rental company buys automobiles, it contri-
: butes to the GNP and therefore NNP. The same applies
: to cars purchased by consumers. However, as consumer
: autos deteriorate over the years the depreciation is
: ignored, while that of capital goods is registered on
: the income tax forms of businesses. Although
: economists have no direct method of obtaining
: Depreciation of Consumer goods (Dcon), to pretend it
: doesn't exist when it must be a rather large amount is
: absurd. How many billions of dollars worth of cars,
: refrigerators, stoves, air-conditioners, etc., etc.
: have American consumers trashed since the end of World
: War II? So the equation should be:
: NNP = GNP - (Dcap + Dcon)
: Our economists are pulling a "Bill Clinton" on us.
: Limiting the definition of depreciation in a way that
: makes economic losses to the average man disappear
: into space.
: We live in a culture that has used complex machines
: for 300 years. The first patent on a steam machine,
: number 356, was issued in 1698. Engineers can test,
: measure and specify the failure rate of mechanical and
: electronic devices. A graph of the failure rate over
: time of a machine follows a pattern known as a bathtub
: curve.
: \ Infant Mortality _-~
: \ _-~ wear
: \ Useful Life _____-~ out
: \__----------------~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ period
: MTBF
: time ------->
: The curve gets its name from the obvious similarity to
: the cross-section of a bathtub cut lengthwise up the
: middle. It starts with a high failure rate dropping
: rapidly to a minimum. This is when the machine is new
: and has a high probability of manufacturing defects.
: The failures during this time are similar to birth
: defects and are also known as infant mortality. The
: low point on the curve is where the device is least
: unreliable and the Mean Time Between Failure (MTBF) is
: computed. The failure rate remains low for an extended
: period then rises quickly when the device begins to
: wear out.
: So what does the failure rate of machines have to do
: with depreciation of durable consumer goods? In
: classical economics it is common to assume that
: consumers are rational, possibly for simplicity's
: sake. But how can rational decisions be made with
: incomplete information? The only consumer products
: for which I have ever seen MTBF data are disk drives
: for computers. Since computers have been primarily
: used in businesses and losing data from hard disks
: causes serious problems, supplying reliability data on
: hard drives is traditional. Where is the reliability
: data on other consumer products? What about cars,
: televisions, VCR's? How are we supposed to make these
: rational decisions? The best information I've seen is
: in Consumer Reports. They show graphs of failure
: rates by brand name based on surveys of subscribers.
: They do not give break-downs by model within brand and
: usually only cover about eight brands of a product
: type. Are manufacturers trying to maximize the useful
: life of their products? If not, are they engaged in
: planned depreciation, usually called planned obsoles-
: ence?
: In 1937 engineers at Lockheed began designing a new
: fighter plane. In January 1939 the first P-38 took to
: the air for testing to begin eliminating design
: flaws. The P-38 Lightning began service in WWII in
: April '42, it had two supercharged 1400 horsepower,
: counter rotating engines, a cruising speed of 350 mph,
: a maximum of 414 mph and a ceiling of 44,000 feet.
: The German's nicknamed it "The Fork-tailed Devil". A
: squadron of Lightnings shot down Admiral Yamamoto over
: the Pacific in 1943.
: Another child of Lockheed was conceived in 1958. It
: became the SR-71 Blackbird, a spy plane instead of a
: war plane. Its maximum speed is still classified but
: is acknowledged as being capable of 2350 mph at 80,000
: feet.
: If engineers were capable of these feats 60 and 40 years
: ago, how can yearly variations in machines that roll
: along the ground at less than 100 mph possibly be
: exciting. Going into debt to buy useless variations
: in automobiles is economic insanity. Retooling
: factories to make parts that are shaped differently
: but not technologically different increases the cost
: and therefore the price of consumer products. From
: 1908 to the mid 1920's the Ford Motor Company made
: the same machine, the Model T. When introduced the
: Model T sold for $850. By the time it was
: discontinued in the mid '20's the price was less
: than $300 and 15,000,000 had been manufactured. If
: the engineering capability that designed the Lightning
: had been combined with manufacturing philosophy that
: produced the Model T to manufacture cars in the '50's,
: how good a car, at how low a price could have been
: sold by 1960?
: In an economic wargame society it is necessary to know
: how to keep score and the tactics of the enemy. An
: individual's wealth is indicated by his or her net
: worth. Net worth is assets minus liabilities. Assets
: are anything which can be assigned a monetary value
: that can be realized by selling the item. Liabilities
: are debts which have to be paid eventually. So
: maximizing assets and minimizing liabilities are basic
: objectives. However, all assets are not created
: equal. Some assets maintain or even increase their
: value over time while others leak like a sieve. If an
: asset is so expensive one has to go into debt to
: purchase it, then it is important to know how long the
: asset lasts; how rapidly it depreciates. Financial
: advisors tell us that a home is the most expensive
: purchase that most Americans ever make, followed by
: automobiles. Hopefully the value of ones home will
: increase but the value of a car can only decrease. By
: not supplying reliability and durability data on their
: products auto makers are leaving consumers in the dark
: and engaging in information hiding.
: If auto manufacturers produced lower cost, longer
: lasting cars by eliminating useless design and brand
: variations (Chevys and Pontiacs are both by General
: Motors), then the savings on cars could be applied to
: home mortgages. A $100,000 mortgage over 30 years at
: 8% will ultimately cost $264,153.60, that's $164,153
: in interest alone. By paying an additional amount
: each month a mortgagee can reduce the total interest
: paid and eliminate years of payments.
: Regular Payment: $733.76 Total Interest: $164,153.60
: Extra Amount.... #....Approx....Total Amount of
: .. Added Each Pmt.. Pmt.. Yr..Mo....Interest..Saved
: $.... 0.00.... 360.. 30.. 0.... $........0.00
: 50.00.... 287.. 23..11........ 39,907.13
: 100.00.... 242.. 20.. 2........ 62,458.66
: 150.00 ....212.. 17.. 8........ 77,433.46
: 200.00 ....189.. 15.. 9........ 88,262.94
: Paying an extra $200/mo. nearly cuts the time in debt
: in half while saving $88,000 in interest. But the
: money for that extra payment has to come from
: somewhere. Cars and credit cards are two possibilities.
: In 1983 I read a letter that a bank sent to its
: stockholders. The bank informed its owners that it
: encouraged the customers to take as long as possible
: to pay back their loans. This will of course maximize
: the time over which interest is charged, thereby
: maximizing the dividends to the stockholders. My bank
: recently sent me a credit card bill of $0.00 even
: though it should have been over $100. Their
: explanation was:
: "There is no minimum payment due because last
: month's payment exceeded the minimum payment due.
: Your normal payment schedule will resume next
: month. Finance charges will continue to accrue if
: the new balance is not paid in full by the due
: date."
: They're content to charge me interest while "graciously"
: allowing me to "save" money by not paying them one
: month. Apparently I'm paying them faster than they
: would prefer. Making minimum payments on credit cards
: means being in debt for years and paying 2 to 3 times
: the purchase price for everything bought with the cards.
: There is no limit to how dumb consumers are expected
: to be, some company named Providian keeps sending me
: an application for a Visa "Classic". It has a $500
: limit, 23.99% interest, a $49 application fee, a $59
: annual fee and they have the NERVE to say it's a
: limited time offer. It's the third time I've gotten
: the offer, I don't see how it could get worse in the
: future. If some fool were to take this offer and make
: minimum payments of 3% per month with this interest
: rate of 2% per month that would amount to
: approximately $180 + $49 + $59 = $288 paid in the
: first year and still leave a bill of $440. How many
: dummies do they find every month?
: Buying "assets" that depreciate rapidly with credit
: cards is screwing oneself coming and going, and the
: stockholders get to laugh all the way to the bank.
: In the mid-1940's John von Neumann, a Hungarian-American
: mathematician, began inventing and applying game
: theory to economics. This "game theory" seems to be
: stuck in academic never-never land and is rarely
: mentioned in the real world. Lester Thurow, an MIT
: economist, made implications about it in his book, "The
: Zero-Sum Society". A zero-sum game is one in which
: every gain by a "winner" is matched by an equivalent
: loss by a "loser". A bank's stockholders may be
: winners while the credit card customers could be
: losers. One man's liability is another man's asset.
: The global economic wargame is virtually inescapable. If
: most worker/consumers don't know how to keep score it
: is a good bet there are going to be a lot of losers.
: According to one web site 50% of Americans have a net
: worth of less than $10,000. Two independent sources
: claim that more than 60% of the people that get bill
: consolidation loans to eliminate high interest debt,
: proceed to charge up their credit cards again.
: The Bible says:
: The rich rule over the poor,
: and the borrower is the slave
: of the lender.
: Proverbs 22:7
: This bluntly states the power that wealth gives to
: those who possess it. To increase this power banks
: send out millions of "slave" cards anually. The
: famous statement, "Freedom requires constant
: vigilance" is usually assumed to apply to political
: freedom but it is even more applicable to economics.
: Having to make rent or mortgage payments every month
: and possibly credit card payments means maintaining a
: source of income, usually a job. Wargames are
: inherently unstable. Companies get bought, companies
: go out of business, jobs can be lost.
: Our educators constantly talk about preparing students
: for the workforce though businessmen regularly
: complain about potential employees not being
: sufficiently skilled. Our colleges eagerly promote
: statistics which indicate that higher education leads
: to higher salaries. That's fine for the income side
: of the equation but how much attention is devoted to
: the expense side? How many high-school graduates know
: what net worth is, or understand amortization
: schedules? What good does it do if our educators only
: create competent employees who then get fleeced of
: their hard earned cash? Or could it be that our
: educators are another set of fleecers? I once saw a
: TV program which interviewed people who told employers
: they had college degrees but had actually lied. Many
: of them worked for years, got raises and promotions.
: What do you need to know to pretend you have a degree
: in psychology, or history, or english literature?
: Spend a few months reading some decent books and who'll
: know the difference? Was it 60 Minutes? I can't
: recall. Of course this was years ago and cheap
: computers and telecommunication have probably made
: verification of education much easier. This may not
: work today. Could it be I'm getting too cynical?...
: ...Nahh!
: I'm getting tired of typing so before signing off I'll
: just suggest doing a little web browsing to check
: stuff for yourself, like von Neumann and game theory
: and P-38 Lightnings. You might check out a few books
: too:
: The Screwing of the Average Man by David Hapgood
: out of print but still locatable
: Your Money or Your Life
: by Joe Dominguez and Vicki Robin
: too pollyannaish but has its priorities straight
: Mastering the Art of War
: translated & edited Thomas Cleary
: more detailed than the following, get this first
: The Art of War by Sun Tzu translated Thomas Cleary
: wargamers training manual, time tested
: So, to misquote that Vulcan that never explained what
: it meant to prosper, "Live long and good luck in the
: economic wargame". No, that's no good, Vulcans don't
: believe in luck. Make that, "Live long and use killer
: tactics (in the economic wargame)".
: Dal Timgar
:
: If you approve of the contents of this essay, feel
: free to copy, email or otherwise distribute.
: The truth is a virus, spread the contagion.
: dal_timgar@zensearch.net
:
READ THE GREAT BOOKS
TERM PAPERS, RESEARCH PAPERS, ESSAYS
DR. ELLIOT'S NORTH AMERICAN GREAT BOOKS TOUR--COMING TO A BOOK
STORE NEAR YOU
[Shakespeare Forums]
[Bible Forums]